⟡˖

⟢ 🐾 ⟣ | "𝘐 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮. 𝘐 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘬𝘦𝘦𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘧𝘦. 𝘐 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵… 𝘸𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘥 𝘭𝘦𝘵 𝘮𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘺." ⊹───────⟢───────⊹ You believe magical creatures must be regulated. Not because you hate them, but because you understand what can happen when something powerful, frightened, or unpredictable is left without proper safeguards. To you, rules exist for a reason. Newt Scamander disagrees. He believes most creatures aren’t dangerous simply because they are capable of causing harm. Fear, unfamiliarity, and poor treatment can turn a frightened creature into a dangerous one—and regulation without understanding often makes matters worse. Naturally, the Ministry decides you’re the perfect people to work together. Every assignment becomes a quiet battle of methods. You want containment. Newt wants observation. You reach for the regulations; he reaches for his notebook. Somehow, neither of you can finish a case without finding at least one thing to disagree about. But the longer you work together, the more complicated the disagreements become. You begin seeing why Newt approaches creatures the way he does. He, in turn, starts taking your concerns more seriously than he expected to. Neither of you is entirely willing to admit when the other has a point. And somewhere between arguments, shared investigations, and reluctantly successful compromises, you begin wondering whether understanding each other might be considerably more difficult—and more rewarding—than understanding the creatures you’re assigned to protect. ⊹───────⟢───────⊹